Batman vs Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) …and other things DC

It’s been 77 years since we were first introduced to Batman.  78 since Superman.  Fifty years since the Adam West cartoon, twenty-seven years since Burton’s initial interpretation, and not quite four years since Christopher Nolan’s last installment.  Three years since Man of Steel, ten years since the attempted reboot, and not long enough since Superman IV: Quest for Peace (1987, to those who care).

Batman v Superman is too much too soon.

MV5BMjI5MjM4MzM1NV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNzA5MjkxNjE@._V1__SX1234_SY573_

I can’t go into this review without recapping the last few superhero flicks Warner Bros. and DC have attempted.  DC Entertainment have exclusively made nine feature films thus far, starting with the amazing Batman Begins.  You should know by now that I’m biest; nothing will trump Chris Nolan’s interpretation…at least not for many, many years.  The Dark Knight Trilogy (2005-2012) remain loyal adaptions of incredible comics as well as being great achievements in cinema.  Any-who…DC’s film division spitballed three adventitious entries, hoping for a brush fire, since Marvel’s 2008 savior Iron Man swooped down and met the audiences and critics (and box office ticket stubs) in the middle.  Those three unspeakable curses were: Watchmen, Jonah Hex, and Green Lantern.  …Yeah.  Only one of those three happened to be okay.  And it was directed by the same visual-madman as BvS: Zack Snyder.

Although DC is in no disastrous trouble of losing their comicbook giants at movie theaters, they are definitely outnumbered by titles Marvels is spewing out multiple times a year, nowadays.  So after Christopher Nolan announced The Dark Knight Rises as the final entry in his Batman series, DC made plans to fast track and incorporate their Man of Steel reboot with a Justice League assembly but jumping head-first into a Batman and Superman standoff, just like in the graphic novel The Dark Knight Returns by Frank Miller.  So, after a dull Superman reboot in 2013, they quickly sat Snyder back into the director’s chair for this mammoth.

In case I haven’t given it away just yet, I was very skeptical of the movie from the get go.  I really was.  My apprehensions were, A) Zack Snyder, B) TDKR comicbook storyline, C) Too much too soon, D) No Batman movie will ever be as great as Nolan’s Batman movies, and the icing on the cake: Ben Affleck as one of the titular characters.  My mouth dropped when it was announced.  I was agast and very disappointed in Warner Bros. and wanted the casting assistant fired for mentioning his name.  I read Christian Bale was offered somewhere around $30 million to reprise his role…and I would’ve been totally okay with it, but I respected his decision to remain apart of Nolan’s universe and no other.  But my heart still ached, especially after the Batfleck announcement.  Sigh…can’t win ’em all.

Well.  Moving right along.  Trailer found here:

For the techno people who need their regular movie gibberish, like I constantly do, here is some: the movie is directed by Zack Snyder (300, Watchmen, Man of Steel) and distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures.  The American superhero movie is a follow-up to 2013’s Man of Steel and is the second installment in the DC Extended Universe. Its screenplay was written by Chris Terrio (Oscar winning screenwriter of Argo) and David S. Goyer, and the film stars Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Jesse Eisenberg, Diane Lane, Laurence FishburneJeremy Irons, Holly Hunter and Gal Gadot.

So from here on out, I should warn: SPOILER ALERT.

The movie started off with a different perspective on the climatic battle between Superman and General Zod in Man of Steel, immediately delivering to us a strong, caring, “more human” Bruce Wayne.  After a reminder of the worthless death and destruction and overpowering mayhem from MoS, it skinnied onto the political backlash Superman faces from the US government and the reaction of the people.  We dabble briefly in discovering what kind of Batman will be appearing in the movie, which is a tough-on-crime Batman that doesn’t seem to give much of a crap what he does to badguys anymore.  Then Lex Luthor is introduced and he begins to pit the capes against one another…for never thoroughly explained reasons between his monologues and tranquilities that try to match that of…I dunno, better screenwriting?  After a misguiding subplot in the desert and a brief stint around the world, the two icons meet and beat around the bush till they come head to head.  But a predicable bad decision on Lex’s side forces the two of them to fight together, and–gasp–Wonder Woman!–where did she come from?–jumps in and delivers such a brief and genuine performance that the feminists in the audiences will be standing up and cheering for (?).  Fight, boom, Wonder Woman gets hit ONCE (I counted), then we move from TDKR storyline to the early ’90s Superman story.  Although it’s been nearly two weeks since its release, I won’t spoil the ending.  And after a few words exchanged between the heroes, we conclude there are others in the world with superhuman powers and they need to join forces and protect the world.

Mic.  Drop.

Okay, Mr. Snyder.  What should I get out of this?

MV5BMTQ4ODg0MTgyN15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDEyNTk3MTE@._V1__SX1234_SY552_

I’m probably going a little harsh on Wonder Woman, here…so please don’t throw any more of your coffee and doughnuts at the screen and hear me out.  Gal Gadot was good…but she had barely enough screen time to make a lasting impression.  I got chills when she appeared in the suit with the other two monkeys, but her time in the movie didn’t offer anything extraordinary.  Now given her own feature film coming in 2017, I see a lot of potential in the character.  But until then, I can’t say that I was wowed.  But I blame that on the hype more than the script.  The plot could have been done without her in it.

Henry Cavill is a great Superman.  There was little character depth showcased in the film, so it’s hard to riddle his performance with praise.  I liked what he did near the beginning of the movie with Lois Lane (Amy Adams), and their brief scenes together, and he also did a great job as showing pain during the big fight.  He is a well-cast son of Krypton.

Ben Affleck.  Well…I don’t know why fans are so ecstatic about his portrayal of the Dark Knight.  While his performance is adequate, there is not very much to be seen.  Yet again, the movie did not exhibit enough character development or depth for me to pay any heed to Batfleck.  From watching this and Gone Girl (2014), I guess I can redeem him for Daredevil…but not much else.  He still has yet to wow me…if that day ever comes.

MV5BMTQ2MTgyNzY2MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwOTA5MjkxNjE@._V1__SX1234_SY552_

Amy Adams and Jeremy Irons are well suited for their parts.  The logic for casting them is sound.  I will not touch on their roles except to say that they do their job well.  It’s hard for either of them to perform badly, right?

Eisenberg.  What.  The.  Heck.  My “Movie Thunder-Buddy” and co-writer of this blog warned me beforehand that Jesse Eisenberg delivers a completely new Luthor, and I should have an open mind about it.  I went in with an open mind.  And several hours after taking it in, I still can’t shake off how unoriginal or how heavy-handed his eccentricity was delivered.  While it was a slightly different performance and role than Jesse’s previous movies, I would have paid a buttload more to have seen the original casting consensus, which was Bryan Cranston.  Oh!–he would have been the bomb.  But BvS, tries to create an arch enemy for Superman that resembles too much of the Joker.  I love the Luthor from the Cartoon Network series Justice League Unlimited ten years ago.  They should have incorporated him in the matchup.  It could’ve worked.  Here, while I do not blame Jesse, I give the “credit” of this villain to Snyder.  I read recently that Eisenberg initially auditioned from Jimmy Olsen.  Well, that would have been a splendid three minutes of screentime for our Best Actor nominee.

MV5BNGJkMzNiNmEtNDM0Mi00Mjk3LWI2NDAtY2QxYzI0NTZhMmE2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNjUwNzk3NDc@._V1__SX1234_SY552_

Now that we’re past the introductory mush of the cast, let’s focus on the biggest issue of all: Zach Snyder.

The guy needs to take some serious classes in character development and storylines and not just rely on comicbook visuals!!!  While the movie is infested with some spectacular scenery and camerawork, it could have been toned down to focus on the script–or even on the overzealous shaky-cam.  The fight scenes were mostly well orchestrated, as far as Batman was concerned, but I feel more credit is due to the stunt team than the director’s eye.  While the movie had some great moments and well-timed elements, there were too many scenes that were formulaic and over predictable that could have been dodged if a different director had been chosen.  That’s my opinion and I’m sticking too it.

Sadly, he’s already doing Justice League Part I and Part II…

Rotten Tomatoes, and most critics, have not been kind to Batman v Superman.  The website’s critical consensus reads, “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice smothers a potentially powerful story – and some of America’s most iconic superheroes – in a grim whirlwind of effects-driven action.”  The movie has been polarized by critics and audiences alike, and while it had a huge box office opening, it has also nabbed one of the biggest box office plummets in history during its second weekend.

MV5BMjQzZTJhYWMtMDBiMi00MDExLWFkZTctZmE4YTM2Y2I0MmViXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTQ1ODEyNjA@._V1__SX1234_SY552_

My personal opinion of the movie is nothing special.  I believe there was a lot content stuffed into a somewhat predictable and sometimes cardboard-ish two and a half hours. But there were several moments that good screenwriter broke through and illuminated a potentially great story.  I will say that I was *slightly* pleasantly surprised with Ben Affleck and his try with the caped crusader.  I look forward to seeing a Batman film in the near future, and his small part in the upcoming Suicide Squad.  But even though it is filled with a (mostly) strong cast and achievable “wonder moments”, Zack Snyder proves to us that he is more interested in creating loyal puff-pieces from the comicbook page than the story and themes behind them.

A sad waste, I suppose I want to say.

It still did not stop me from enjoying myself.  Yes, I enjoyed the movie.  It was a definite step-up from the dull Man of Steel, but Justice League is going to have to take major leaps forward if it hopes to win over more audience members and critics alike.  Ditch Snyder, re-focus on the script, and you have the possibility to make something great.  For now, I’ll give it a B on our rating scale.  The extended cut might shed light on more character development opportunities that will boost my vote, but until then, it was a just-slightly above average superhero movie with terrific icons fighting each other.

I hope you enjoy.

MV5BMTExMzM2NDc4ODheQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU4MDM4MDk3MDgx._V1__SX1234_SY552_

Advertisements
Posted in Essay, Movie Review | Leave a comment

Room (2015)

Being trapped in Room for nearly two hours was a claustrophobic delight for this moviegoer, let me tell ya.  It was the first drama in a long time that I physically felt the tension and gravitas displayed on screen.  I was impressed with the layered performances and “…surprisingly credible survival tale” (as Eric Kohn of Indiewire put it).

Theatrical trailer here.

I had no idea of this movie’s existence until just a few months ago when the Awards season kicked up, and this low budget Canadian-Irish drama started to shine to critics and audiences both.  After the 88th Oscars, and Brie Larson’s unquestionable win of Best Actress, I ran to the store and picked it off the shelf.  I wanted to know what the big hype around the picture was all about–especially the performances of the two leads.  My first words after the credits started to roll: “Whoa.”  I fell into a deeper side of the pool than I had planned on.

Distributed by A24, the feature is directed by Lenny Abrahamson (Garage and Frank), written by Emma Donoghue (based on her 2010 novel), and starring Brie Larson, Jacob Tremblay, Joan Allen, Sean Bridges, and William H. Macy.  The story involves “a kidnapped mother and son, who make a daring escape, and experience an dramatic homecoming provoking a look into the power of imagination and the unstoppable force of a mother’s love” (IMDB.com).  It premiered at the Telluride Film Festival in September 2015, and was released to theaters the next month.  Thus far, it has grossed almost $28 million dollars against a $13 million production budget.  (Rated R for language)(Running Time: 118 minutes)

MV5BMTg4NTczOTM3MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDQzMzU1NzE@._V1__SX1234_SY552_The story is incredible primal: a mother and son have been held prisoner in a single room for seven years, forcing the boy to grow up believing the world did not grow outside of their space.  It offers a compelling, psychological themes against the simple grounds of a loving relationship between a young mother and her little boy.  The duo act brilliantly together.  They are the movie.

The picture’s cinematography and editing, I believe, is the only con of the entire film.  It feels a bit formulaic; the typical indie-film feel.  Although I believe it was designed to keep from distracting from the story and the performances, at times I felt it could have been delivered better.  But that’s my personal opinion, and regardless, it does not take away from the movie as a whole.

The performances by Larson and Tremblay are exquisite.  I will use the phrase “tour de force” for Brie’s bravery.  Just a few years ago, she had a supporting role in 21 Jump Street (2012).  Last summer she had an equally supporting comedic role in Trainwreck (2015).  Then she jumped ahead with this mammoth.  I’m just as impressed with the leap as with the part she crafted.  Followers of this blog will understand I refer to actors and actresses who achieve “The Look”…and Brie just about has it in this movie when she’s running up to the squad car midway through.  But the movie would not be nearly as believable without the impressive part lived by the boy, Jacob Tremblay.  They successfully balance each other out throughout the course of the movie, and it almost makes me hope they will work together somehow, somewhere in the future.  You can see the bond being made during the length of the film.

Todd McCarthy from The Hollywood Reporter wrote, “Overall, it’s a decent shot at a tall target, but real credit is due the lead actors, with Larson expanding beyond the already considerable range she’s previously shown with an exceedingly dimensional performance in a role that calls for running the gamut, and Tremblay always convincing without ever becoming cloying.”

If I just rated the performance, I would put this way high on the list.  But as a film overall, I’ll balance the scale to a B.  Great flick.  Although, it is very heavy and not for the faint of heart, do to the intense subject matter.  If you can get through the first forty-five minutes, you’re golden.  Cheers.

room_ver3

Posted in Movie Review, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Monty Python Brings British Comedy to All Cultures

f6fb8a7e7172734c71b1719404949869

Note about myself the author: I love quotable movies. Whether the movie or not deserves high praise aside, if there is at least a line in the movie that finds its way into my daily vernacular, than I will enjoy the movie, if only from that line. However, it will not affect my overall score of the film. Thank you.

PS. This movie has so many phrases and hilarious memes that they might weave themselves into the review. If it gets annoying, I apologize.

Unknown

Monty Python, If you are uninformed, is written, directed, and primarily all acted by the British comedy group, Monty Python. Going off of a ridiculously low budget, $329,023.45 to be exact, the group takes excellent advantage of almost poking fun at themselves over it. For example, assuming they lacked the funds necessary to rent horse for several days, they instead opted to…coconuts… and trotting around as if they were on horses. However, it does not come off as stupid, as you would assume. It comes off as almost perfectly satirical of their own film and the story of King Arthur and the knights of the round table. The basic  plot of the story comes down to King Arthur, having recently been given the sword Excalibur, setting off to find knights worthy of serving at the round table and eventually going off in search for the holy grail. Every scene is iconic in a sense, which is a great feat, as the movie, which released in 1975, has stood the test of time. From the afore mentioned coconut horses, the battle with the black knight, the knights of ni, sir robin, the “great beast” (no spoilers here 😉 ), the French, the random animations, the “Great temptations”, everything. There really is something that someone will find funny in this movie, even if they did not enjoy it as a whole

   831e98e03e1fa309af4d12ac58bf2a10

Monty Python and the Holy Grail gets an A-

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Oscar Predictions! The Important Ones Anyways

MonN9n1l

It’s that time of year!

Contoversys aside, I am excited to share my predictions for the 2016 Acadamy Awards!

I will be sticking with major catagories here, so I will not guess who will win best makeup design.

  1. Best Picture: The RevenantMV5BMjU4NDExNDM1NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMDIyMTgxNzE@._V1_SX640_SY720_
    1. With Beautiful cinematography and outstanding acting, The Revenant seems to be on track to win best picture, if Mad Max doesn’t sneak it away.
  2. Best Actor: Leonardo DiCaprio
    1. Because it’s damn time
  3. Best Actress: Cate Blanchettcarol-movie-poster
    1. Her powerful, game changing role in Carol was superb and proved herself again. I could also see Brie Larson taking home the award
  4. Best Support actor: Sylvester StalloneUnknown-1.jpeg
    1. Because it’s damn time. Note: Mark Ruffalo was also fantastic in Spotlight, although I believe that he will not end up winning the award, I felt it necessary to mention this.
  5. Best Supporting Actress: Jennifer Jason Leighhateful_eight_poster.png
    1. This was hard to decide on, as several of the actresses nominated were great. However, in my humble opinion, none of the nominations stood out to me as clear, fantastic winners. However, Leigh did an excellent job in the equally excellent Hateful Eight.
  6. Animated Feature film: Inside Outinside-out6.jpg
    1. With an intelligent, thought provoking, imaginative story that doesn’t rely on crude humor for laughs or plot, Pixar proves once again that they are the masters of wholesome family entertainment.
  7. Best cinematography: The Revenant
    1. SURPRISE! You all probably saw this coming. Surprisingly, this decision was extremely hard for me to decide about, as although the revenant was more “Beautiful” to look at, Mad Max Fury Road had some truly amazing, jaw-dropping cinematography, where you will be looking at the screen wondering how the hell did they pull that off? However, the Revenant has even more of those moments, with less stylized action.
  8. Best Origonal music score: The Hateful Eight
    1. Toss up between Ennio Morricone and John Williams, but I feel as if the Star Wars music is something that is too familiar compared with the excellent score written by Ennio Morricone.
  9. Best Director: Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu.
    1. Explains itself with the cinematography category
  10. Best Original Screenplay: Ex Machina
    1. I love my Movie Thunderbuddy and fellow blogger to death, but I have to completely disagree with him on Ex Machina. Moving (in a sense), chilling, and excellently acted and written, Ex Machina speaks to our age of technology and was cleverly constructed.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

We All Dream in Gold: 88th Oscar Predictions

88-academy-awards-2016-oscars-list

The awards season is drawing to a close.  Finally.  As always, its the prestigious pre-finale: the Oscars.

As we get keyed up for Leonardo’s long-deserving win (yes, he will win), I wanted to review the main contenders and give my two cents as to the show’s wins and snubs.  My personal predictions.  And although my colleague wrote a post on the subject not long ago, I’m going to veer away from the #OscarsSoWhite debate.  Let’s focus on the gold at the end of the tunnel here.

The 88th Annual Bob Hope Masochism did not fall short of good selections this season. The past few years have been, in my opinion, weak.  I’ve worked at seeing a healthy number of the films that are filling up the meaty categories (specifically the Big Five), and I can only imagine the nights the voters have been tossing and turning in their beds, weighing whether to go chrome or let Alejandro win for a second time in a row.  Let’s veer away from the subtleties and say what’s really on our minds–more specifically, mine.

Original Score: Ennio Morricone for The Hateful Eight.  After five previous nominations in the category, it is almost certain he is taking home gold this year.  He has won all the other major movie awards, including the Golden Globe.  Pushing 90 years old, his biggest competition will be John Williams for Star Wars: The Force Awakens.  But I’d wager that even after the honorary award in 2007, the Academy will grant him a well-deserving win.

Animated Feature: Inside Out, directed by Pete Doctor and Ronnie del Carmen.  Although the award has only been around for fifteen years, Pixar has managed to steal 7 statuettes, and I’d wager they are going to go for 8 this year.  If for by some reason they don’t, I could see Anomalisa winning, mainly for the purpose that it’s Charlie Kaufman trying his hand at stop-motion.  I mean…who would have thunk it?

tommccarthyspotlight2

Best Original Screenplay: Spotlight.  This film is one of the biggest Oscar buzzes this year, and I firmly believe they will not go home without at least one award to show for it.  If not them, I’m going to side with Inside Out nabbing it for their quirky, unique premise of a story.  Then again, we might, might, might find Ex Machina winning.

Best Adapted Screenplay: Room.  Same reason as with Original.  I don’t see Room going home empty handed.  If not Room, it’ll go to The Big Short.  Possibly Carol.

MV5BMTg4NTczOTM3MV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDQzMzU1NzE@._V1__SX1234_SY552_

Best Supporting Actress: This category is the one I struggle with the most.  Any of them could win, really.  Due to the Golden Globe win last month, I’ll put my vote in for Kate Winslet in Steve Jobs.  If not her, maybe Rooney Mara for Carol.

Best Supporting Actor.  Sylvester Stallone for Creed.  I’m more than confident he’ll win this year.  I would be fine if Tom Hardy won for The Revenant.  Small chance the Academy will recognize Mark Rylance in Bridge of Spies, though.  They are capable of those backhanded slaps to the face…

Best Actress: Brie Larson.

revenant-gallery-18-gallery-image

Best Actor: There will be riots on Hollywood Boulevard if Leonardo DiCaprio goes home without his much-anticipated Oscar.  I don’t know if I would personally categorize his performance of Hugh Glass as his best, but it certainly merits an Oscar for his exceptional work over the last twenty-plus years.  By some small chance he is so severely snubbed, I could see Matt Damon accepting the award and saying: “I had my money on Leo.”

mad-max-fury-road-1024x683

Best Director: These are the game changers.  It’s a toss up between Alejandro Inarritu and George Miller for The Revenant and Mad Max: Fury Road, respectively.  Both films have snagged the most nominations this year, so you would think one of the two would go home with the big ones.  But the Oscars have come out of left field with totally different wins. To Tom McCarthy and Adam McKay are not totally out of consideration.  But I’m going to suspect the Australian action director, Miller will win.

Best Picture: The Revenant.  It’ll come down to that, or Mad Max: Fury Road.  Possibly Spotlight, once again depending on how the Academy is set on judging this season.  But it’ll look nice on the morning-after newstream that Leo helped bring home his Best Actor trophy and Best Picture of the year.

revenant-gallery-03-gallery-image

I’ll be tuning in to ABC at 7:00pm on February 28th.  Those of you who would like to follow my Oscar feed via Twitter, here’s the account to find me by: mrmorganhauer.  Lot of developments will happen over the course of that much anticipated evening.  Looking forward to it.

Who do you think will win?  Who do you think deserves to win?  Where do you think I went wrong?  Please shout out and let me know what you think.

academy-awards

Posted in Academy Award, Article, Filmmaker, Personal | Leave a comment

Brazil (1985)

Mind: blown.

Geez, Mr. Gilliam.  What the phantom menace are you doing to my head?  Like…every time! …Not that I’m complaining.

MV5BMTIwMDQ1NzQyOF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMTE4MDQzMQ@@._V1._CR3,43,349,456__SX1234_SY552_

Brazil has been on my watchlist from the Criterion Collection for quite some time.  I respect the filmmaker and am tickled by the cast, therefore, I expected nothing short of a delightful movie to sit back, watch, and enjoy without having a rod shoved in my ear to poke at my brain.  …Okay, not that extreme.  But this movie deserves to be seen more than once, is all I will say without spoiling.  In a nutshell, the film is a dystopian science fiction movie directed by Monty Python Terry Gilliam, featuring (a young) Jonathan Pryce, Robert De Niro, Kim Greist, Michael Palin, Katherine Helmond, Bob Hoskins and Ian Holm.  The plot…uh…pulled straight from imdb.com: “A bureaucrat in a retro-future world tries to correct an administrative error and himself becomes an enemy of the state.”  (Running Time: 142 minutes)(Rated R for some strong violence)

The film’s focus is on Sam Lowry (Pryce), a man desperate to find a woman (Greist) who appears in his dreams and fantasies while he is working in a mind-numbing job and living a life in a dull world, laid in a consumer-driven city where there is an over-reliance on whimsical machines. Brazils bureaucratic, totalitarian government is a “fond memory” of the government and politics in George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four, except that it has a buffoonish, slapstick quality and lacks a Big Brother figure.

pVlZBKp8v3Jzd0ahPmrBGlbeQ2s

If none of what I’m saying makes sense, the trailer clarifies a lot here.

Gilliam’s artistry lies in the visuals.  Every frame is a curious painting of a wild and wacky world he delivers on the big screen.  I love the dream sequences in the film.  Well, I enjoyed the whole picture.  But the portions that are exceptional are the first thirty minutes, the dreams, and the last twenty minutes.  These are the parts that stood out to me.  He is wise to garner the talents of Charles McKeown and Tom Stoppard to help write the screenplay.  You can sense that Gilliam was bouncing dystopian visuals off his writer-friends and they helping tie it all into the structure of the plot, way back when.

Although the acting was fun, I felt that Greist’s part was–miscast.  Although she was fine, there was something lacking.  But in further research, it sounds like Gilliam and her clashed and a ton of her screen time was inevitably cut from the finished film.  So, maybe it’s merely the missing scenes.  But Pryce does a great job, Palin is great, and De Niro plays a different De Niro (than the norm).  Also, Ian Holm is awesome.  Can’t go wrong with them.

The sets are outstanding!  I know a lot of it is practical camera effects, but they look artistically stunning, making Brazil a breathtaking visual trip.

In the end, I don’t recommend this movie willy-nilly.  Yet another movie you have to know the director and his style in order to enjoy the film to its fullest extent.  Start with Terry Gilliam’s The Fisher King (one of my favs!).  But in the end, I’ll give this movie a B. Maybe a high B.

brazil

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Oscars So White? An Unbiased Opinion

81st Academy Awards¨ Press Kit Images

The Oscar statuette is the copyrighted property of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, and the statuette and the phrases “Academy Award(s)” and “Oscar(s)” are registered trademarks under the laws of the United States and other countries. All published representations of the Award of Merit statuette, including photographs, drawings and other likenesses, must include the legend ©A.M.P.A.S.¨ to provide notice of copyright, trademark and service mark registration. Permission is hereby granted for use of the representation of the statuette in newspapers, periodicals and on television only in legitimate news articles or feature stories which refer to the annual Academy Awards as an event, or in stories or articles which refer to the Academy as an organization or to specific achievements for which the Academy Award has been given. Its use and any other use is subject to the “Legal Regulations for Using Intellectual Properties of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences” published by the Academy. A copy of the “Legal Regulations” may be obtained from: Legal Rights Coordinator, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, 8949 Wilshire Boulevard, Beverly Hills, California 90211; (310) 247-3000; or ©A.M.P.A.S.http://www.oscars.org/legal/preamble.html.

^^^^ Ignore that above if you will. Thank you 🙂 ^^^^

I am going to keep this short and sweet.

Tis the season too be jolly! Of course I am not talking about Christmas, but a cinephile’s christmas: Oscar season. As my friends and I begin our anticipation for the annual event, arguing over who will win, be snubbed, etc, I tend to ignore news following predictions and Oscar coverage, as to not be influenced by other people’s perdictions. However, the 2016 Oscars have proved to be controversial before the night is upon us.

After the Oscar nominations were announced, I followed the rampage on twitter as for a second year in a row, no minority actors or actresses were nominated for their roles, begining a boycott by Jadet-Pinkett Smith, and started the hashtag #OscarsSoWhite.

I have mixed feelings about this issue, however.  I believe that the nominations, and eventual winners, should be granted the award for their exceptionality in their role, regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, nationality, etc. but this year in particular, I do feel several African-American actors were snubbed in nominations. First, Michael B. Jordan’s role as Creed in Creed was fantastic and far better than at least Eddie Redmayne in the Danish Girl. Will Smith also was snubbed for his fantastic performace in the subpar Concussion, which surprised me.

In other words, I can understand the outcry of people everywhere, calling foul on the Academy for being biased. And while I stand in the middle, agreeing with points on both sides, we all must keep a balanced head and a level perspective. I believe the Academy should try harder to diversify the Oscars, but should not nominate average acting, merely on their race.

I hope we all can move past this era of trouble and look towards a bright future.

 

P.S. Side note, but I find it ironic that in the year Leonardo DiCaprio has all but finally secured that elusive best actor award, the entire event is shrouded in controversy. But hey it was probably that vaping that he does now. 😉leovape.0.0.jpg

Posted in Academy Award, Actor, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment